Related News Real Estate Entrepreneurs

Related Articles

Remote investment insurance

insurance? How to insure ourselves with a remote investment Recently someone contacted me to help her find a renovation contractor because the offers she received were very high .. What is the connection between the sentence in the previous line and insurance? Good question! The connection is that that nice lady did not insure the properties in her possession (held 6 properties) and the properties were damaged in a tropical storm / hurricane… If she had done the insurances she would…

Responses

  1. Insurance for the property itself, not for tenants, should be determined by the value of the home and not by the value of the property.
    This is a place that many fall into.
    If you have a house worth $ XNUMX, on land worth $ XNUMX,
    The instinct (and what insurance companies point you to) is surely up to $ 200.
    This is not true. Insurers according to what can be destroyed, again it is the insurance of the built and not the insurance of the people in the construction.
    Therefore, the insurance should cover up to 100, and even less, because the entire property is unlikely to be consumable.

  2. In my experience, the main parameters that will determine the premium price are coverage for viability and if you want to insure by monetary value or the cost of replacing a building.
    Generally by monetary value it will be cheaper.
    As far as viability is concerned, it is advisable to take a minimum of 500k and have a minimum of one million said.

    The cost depends on many variables, including what I mentioned, the year of construction, the area, etc.
    In a very general way, I would say that a reasonable premium for a mediocre small family single built a few decades ago would be around $ 1000.